Keyword summary
60% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,031 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Transit Measure results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,418 hits . Analysis detected 6,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,093 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,281 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Transit Measure is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Seattle Transit Measure
Keyword details
Total words: 6,093
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Tu Quoque: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst