Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Tech Workers results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 126 hits . Analysis detected 637 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (12,246 of 34,832 keywords). This Seattle Tech Workers is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Seattle Tech Workers
Keyword details
Total words: 1,096
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst