Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Audit results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 283 hits . Analysis detected 1,809 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,852 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,481 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Audit is worse (more manipulative) than 69.40% of the peer group. Seattle Audit
Keyword details
Total words: 1,852
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.4% percentile 3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst