Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Davis results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 1,709 hits . Analysis detected 15,428 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,756 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,974 of 37,536 keywords). This Sean Davis is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Sean Davis
Keyword details
Total words: 11,756
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst