Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientist results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.6% saturation with 822 hits. Analysis detected 3,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,600 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,297 of 36,396 keywords). This Scientist is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Scientist
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠80%Scientist (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,600
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 31.6%31.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 31.6%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos