Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scientific Information results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 502 hits . Analysis detected 4,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,621 of 37,536 keywords). This Scientific Information is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Scientific Information
Keyword details
Total words: 5,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst