Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Schwartz results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 2,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,356 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,985 keywords). This Schwartz is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Schwartz
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Schwartz (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,356
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos