Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Finances results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 1,531 hits . Analysis detected 6,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,100 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,341 of 37,536 keywords). This School Finances is better (less manipulative) than 67.50% of the peer group. School Finances
Keyword details
Total words: 8,100
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst