Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sarah Sanders results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 636 hits. Analysis detected 5,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Sarah Sanders is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Sarah Sanders
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Sarah Sanders (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 23.4%23.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 16.6%16.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 20.0%20.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.6%15.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 23.4%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos