Keyword summary
10% 3 analyzed articles/videos 6,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sand Creek Massacre results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Indoctrination , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 737 hits . Analysis detected 8,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,567 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 2% (37,077 of 37,536 keywords). This Sand Creek Massacre is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Sand Creek Massacre
Keyword details
Total words: 18,567
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst