Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctioned Oil results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.3% saturation with 688 hits. Analysis detected 3,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,221 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of 93% (2,706 of 37,536 keywords). This Sanctioned Oil is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Sanctioned Oil
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
93%Sanctioned Oil (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,221
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 56.4%56.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 31.3%31.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 32.8%32.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 19.7%19.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Keyword 56.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 32.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 31.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos