Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco State results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 430 hits . Analysis detected 3,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,304 of 37,419 keywords). This San Francisco State is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group. San Francisco State
Keyword details
Total words: 5,484
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst