Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,970 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Schools results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 414 hits . Analysis detected 2,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,982 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,378 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Schools is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. San Francisco Schools
Keyword details
Total words: 6,982
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst