Keyword summary
⁠44%4 analyzed articles/videos2,053 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Board Of Supervisors results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 659 hits. Analysis detected 7,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,794 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (29,528 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Board Of Supervisors is better (less manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
San Francisco Board Of Supervisors
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,794
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510021.3% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos