Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Bart Fare Evasion Gate Stuck results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 266 hits. Analysis detected 1,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (14,599 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Bart Fare Evasion Gate Stuck is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
San Francisco Bart Fare Evasion Gate Stuck
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 1,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos