Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video671 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Archdiocese results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 2,797 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,684 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (11,999 of 35,654 keywords). This San Francisco Archdiocese is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
San Francisco Archdiocese
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
67%San Francisco Archdiocese (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,684
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos