Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Fernando Valley results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 531 hits . Analysis detected 5,408 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,154 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,793 of 37,536 keywords). This San Fernando Valley is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. San Fernando Valley
Keyword details
Total words: 7,154
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst