Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 6,821 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Bernardino results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 4,594 hits . Analysis detected 24,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,622 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,245 of 37,536 keywords). This San Bernardino is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. San Bernardino
Keyword details
Total words: 26,622
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles26.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst