Keyword summary
28%3 analyzed articles/videos1,650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Andreas Fault results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,028 hits. Analysis detected 8,916 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,772 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,398 of 37,536 keywords). This San Andreas Fault is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
San Andreas Fault
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
33%San Andreas Fault (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,772
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate