Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Busch results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 724 hits . Analysis detected 3,689 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (11,402 of 34,832 keywords). This Samantha Busch is worse (more manipulative) than 67.30% of the peer group. Samantha Busch
Keyword details
Total words: 4,408
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst