Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Darnold results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.6% saturation with 2,177 hits . Analysis detected 9,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,678 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (10,034 of 37,536 keywords). This Sam Darnold is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Sam Darnold
Keyword details
Total words: 6,678
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.3% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 32.6% 32.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 32.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst