Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safe Drinking Water Act results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hindsight Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 942 hits . Analysis detected 5,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,696 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,526 of 37,536 keywords). This Safe Drinking Water Act is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Safe Drinking Water Act
Keyword details
Total words: 6,696
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst