Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,750 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Saas results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 5,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,000 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,643 of 37,536 keywords). This Saas is better (less manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
Saas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Saas (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,000
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510026.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos