Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ryan Coogler results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 880 hits . Analysis detected 3,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,040 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 55,031 keywords). This Ryan Coogler is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ryan Coogler
Keyword details
Total words: 3,040
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 28.9% 28.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.2% 20.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst