Keyword summary
8% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,105 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russia Japan Relations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 2,213 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,973 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (24,262 of 37,530 keywords). This Russia Japan Relations is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group. Russia Japan Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 3,973
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Middle Ground: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst