Keyword summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 1,071 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Running Backs results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 355 hits . Analysis detected 1,845 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,284 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (38,542 of 54,529 keywords). This Running Backs is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Running Backs
Keyword details
Total words: 4,284
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst