Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Romance Scams results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 554 hits . Analysis detected 4,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,630 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,617 of 37,536 keywords). This Romance Scams is worse (more manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group. Romance Scams
Keyword details
Total words: 4,630
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 0.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst