Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roman Catholic Church results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 492 hits . Analysis detected 4,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,378 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,290 of 37,536 keywords). This Roman Catholic Church is better (less manipulative) than 72.70% of the peer group. Roman Catholic Church
Keyword details
Total words: 5,378
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst