Keyword summary
99% 1 analyzed article/video 463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rock For Choice results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 571 hits . Analysis detected 2,442 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,071 of 37,533 keywords). This Rock For Choice is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Rock For Choice
Keyword details
Total words: 1,389
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.5% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 41.1% 41.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 41.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst