Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,933 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Roberts Projects results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,598 hits . Analysis detected 8,341 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (24,865 of 34,293 keywords). This Roberts Projects is better (less manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. Roberts Projects
Keyword details
Total words: 11,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.5% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.1% 22.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst