Keyword summary
93% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robert Kraft results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 888 hits . Analysis detected 5,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,529 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 63% (14,198 of 37,536 keywords). This Robert Kraft is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group. Robert Kraft
Keyword details
Total words: 4,529
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst