Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,009 analyzed words
BS Summary: These River City Journalism Fund results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 4,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,027 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (7,409 of 37,536 keywords). This River City Journalism Fund is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
River City Journalism Fund
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,027
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510080.3% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 30.3%30.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos