Keyword summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Blumenthal results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Recency Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 1,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,377 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (13,132 of 35,668 keywords). This Richard Blumenthal is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Richard Blumenthal
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠64%Richard Blumenthal (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,377
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos