Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rhonda Hamm Niebruegge results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 433 hits . Analysis detected 2,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,192 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,188 of 34,608 keywords). This Rhonda Hamm Niebruegge is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group. Rhonda Hamm Niebruegge
Keyword details
Total words: 4,192
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst