Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rhino Linings results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 177 hits. Analysis detected 1,874 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Rhino Linings is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Rhino Linings
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Rhino Linings (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.1%7.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Horn Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos