Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,965 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Revenue Growth results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Confirmation Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 6,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,860 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,442 of 37,536 keywords). This Revenue Growth is better (less manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group. Revenue Growth
Keyword details
Total words: 7,860
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.5% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst