Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 4,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Revenge For The Sixties results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,927 hits . Analysis detected 11,302 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,760 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (31,573 of 34,923 keywords). This Revenge For The Sixties is better (less manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group. Revenge For The Sixties
Keyword details
Total words: 17,760
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst