Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rev Frederick Haynes Iii results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 740 hits. Analysis detected 4,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (9,040 of 37,536 keywords). This Rev Frederick Haynes Iii is worse (more manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Rev Frederick Haynes Iii
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,016
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

76% percentile
025507510075.9% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos