Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Resilient Supply Chains results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 438 hits. Analysis detected 2,052 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,747 of 36,710 keywords). This Resilient Supply Chains is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Resilient Supply Chains
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
90%Resilient Supply Chains (selected)8%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,440
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

90% percentile
025507510089.8% percentile
7.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate