Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Research Stations results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 6,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,460 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (26,881 of 35,014 keywords). This Research Stations is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Research Stations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
24%Research Stations (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,460
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos