Keyword summary
17%2 analyzed articles/videos937 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rescuers results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 767 hits. Analysis detected 3,101 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,912 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,134 of 37,536 keywords). This Rescuers is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Rescuers
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
20%Rescuers (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,912
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.1%11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos