Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,469 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Republican National Committee results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 2,330 hits . Analysis detected 13,479 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,828 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,444 of 37,536 keywords). This Republican National Committee is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Republican National Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 7,828
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.5% percentile 3.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.8% 29.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst