Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reporters Committee For Freedom Of The Press results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 2,091 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (8,413 of 37,536 keywords). This Reporters Committee For Freedom Of The Press is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Reporters Committee For Freedom Of The Press
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 26.0%26.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos