Keyword summary
40% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Repayment Plan results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 1,872 hits . Analysis detected 12,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,638 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,992 of 37,536 keywords). This Repayment Plan is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Repayment Plan
Keyword details
Total words: 16,638
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst