Keyword summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reimbursement Dispute results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 600 hits. Analysis detected 2,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,439 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (9,541 of 37,536 keywords). This Reimbursement Dispute is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
Reimbursement Dispute
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠75%Reimbursement Dispute (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,439
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

75% percentile
025507510074.6% percentile
4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 24.6%24.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 24.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos