Keyword summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regulators results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,039 hits . Analysis detected 8,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,312 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (23,931 of 34,978 keywords). This Regulators is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Regulators
Keyword details
Total words: 9,312
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst