Keyword summary
34% 3 analyzed articles/videos 941 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Region results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,009 hits . Analysis detected 4,634 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,069 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 50% (18,400 of 36,448 keywords). This Region is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Region
Keyword details
Total words: 5,069
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst