Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,669 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rebellion results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 27.7% saturation with 2,960 hits . Analysis detected 13,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,676 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,674 of 35,675 keywords). This Rebellion is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Rebellion
Keyword details
Total words: 10,676
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.7% 27.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst