Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reality Tv Star results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Pessimism Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 702 hits. Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Reality Tv Star is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Reality Tv Star
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%Reality Tv Star (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,768
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.4%25.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos