Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 692 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reality Tv Star results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Pessimism Bias , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 702 hits . Analysis detected 3,023 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,768 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,309 of 37,536 keywords). This Reality Tv Star is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Reality Tv Star
Keyword details
Total words: 2,768
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.2% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 25.4% 25.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst