Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Real Time Investigations Center results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 276 hits. Analysis detected 2,565 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,343 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Real Time Investigations Center is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Real Time Investigations Center
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,343
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 7.8%7.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos